“Authentication-based attacks were the most popular hacking threat action. ‘The easiest and least detectable way to gain unauthorized access is to leverage someone’s (or something’s) authorized access. Why reinvent the wheel? So, it really comes as no surprise that authentication-based attacks factored into about four of every five breaches involving hacking in our 2012 dataset. Nor is it all that surprising that we see this year after year.”
And, since 95% of enterprises use Active Directory, just about all authentication-based attackers have one thing in common: they must interact with Active Directory to enable a successful attack.
Awkward segue/analogy alert: Now back to my Father’s Day weekend. Active Directory is like the Thermopylae for InfoSec professionals. More often than not, the bad guys have no choice but to pass through Active Directory to complete their invasion of the enterprise.
Let’s take, for example, a Pass-the-Hash attack. Bad guys gain access to an individual workstation – using a phishing email, for example – where local admin credentials are stored in memory because one of the IT guys recently installed a software upgrade. The bad guys run Mimikatz to extract all credentials in memory, but the compromised machine has only the laptop’s user credentials, and those for a local admin account, so they’re stuck….but not really.
Quick aside: in 2014, a Tech Ed Seminar was led by Mark Simos and Nicholas DiCola (https://tinyurl.com/ozbb5xp), two security architects in Microsoft’s services group. Essentially they engage in customer consulting efforts before and after breaches to design the most effective network architectures to combat attackers. During that presentation, they asked the security professionals in the audience how many use the same password for all workstation local admin accounts. The result was “about half.”
Now back to our attackers “stuck” at the single workstation they’ve compromised. Remember that they have local admin credentials on the compromised machine, so they can now try those credentials on other workstations. Consequently, if the company they’ve penetrated happens to be one of those that raised their hand when asked if they use a common local admin account password across the organization, they now have local admin credentials for all workstations on the network. The attackers log into them one-by-one and eventually find a laptop where a domain admin account was used recently to install software. Those domain admin credentials are stored in the workstation’s memory, and now the attacker has domain admin credentials and effectively has access to everything.
But, as noted above, the attackers have to “try” those local admin credentials on multiple workstations to expand their attack from the single-machine beachhead that buys them very little. However, another, more accurate, way to phrase “trying” is that the attackers must attempt to authenticate via Active Directory. There’s no way for the bad guys to expand their attack without going through Active Directory…just like the Persians had no choice but to pass through Thermopylae to invade Greece.
How pervasive is this attack technique? In a word (or two), a lot. During the Microsoft seminar referenced previously, the presenters offered the following:
“Pretty much in every incident response we’ve seen, there’s been some use of credential theft. Almost every time. Maybe one or two cases where we didn’t actually see that…once they’re in, Pass-the-Hash. That’s the way they go.”
But how successful are PTH attacks? Again, according to the Microsoft security architects, very: the average time for Pass-the-Hash attackers to obtain Domain Admin credentials is…48 hours.
Bottom line: the key is Active Directory. Understanding authentication activities across the organization make it very difficult for attackers to move laterally without detection. Still, gaining that “understanding” and insight into AD activities is non-trivial, and requires analyzing hundreds of what may be completely
normal events when collected individually. A legitimate local admin account authenticating to a workstation happens all the time; knowing that a series of local admin logins deviates from normal patterns requires intelligence and context…none of which can be obtained from the analysis of native logs.
Bottom bottom line: we can help. Our StealthINTERCEPT product includes built-in, out-of-the-box analytics to detect and alert on horizontal account movement, and operates completely independent of native logs. We call it an “Active Directory Firewall.” You can call it your “300” for your network’s Thermopylae pass.
Author’s Note: Graphics used in this blog post were taken from the previously-referenced 2014 Tech Ed webinar: https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/TechEd/NorthAmerica/2014/DCIM-B213#fbid=?hashlink=fbid, an exceptionally-informative seminar I encourage all readers to take the time to watch.
Don’t miss a post! Subscribe to The Insider Threat Security Blog here:
Adam Laub is the Senior Vice President of Product Management at STEALTHbits Technologies. He is responsible for setting product strategy, defining future roadmap, driving strategic sales engagements, supporting demand generation activities, enabling the sales organization and all aspects of product evangelism.
Since joining STEALTHbits in 2005, Adam has held multiple positions within the organization, including Sales, Marketing, and Operational Management roles.
Adam holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA.